TOPIC UPDATES FOR 2023: TOPIC 2 (PART 2) CONSEQUENCES & PERMANENT SIDE-EFFECTS THAT RESULT FROM THE USE OF HORMONE BLOCKERS

ORIGINAL TOPIC POST= 2) CONSEQUENCES & PERMANENT SIDE-EFFECTS THAT RESULT FROM THE USE OF HORMONE BLOCKERS

We are updating our Topics in 2023 with the most recent and relevant information regarding over-medicalized youth and identity confusion due to queer theory/gender ideology. Since the launch of our website in 2019, only more information has come to light validating our view that pediatric transition is dangerous for children and teens. We support honest and open inquiries regarding this topic. Our focus is protecting lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth from harm, and we want the best long-term health outcomes for all youth, regardless of identity or orientation.

More serious health consequences from puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries are coming to light. This information is forcing the trans-activist-captured legacy media to admit there is anything dangerous about the affirmative model protocol.

They Paused Puberty, but Is There a Cost? As more transgender children seek medical care, families confront many unknowns

We are adding a study indicating the pubertal process is very complex regarding brain maturation.

Coming of age in the frontal cortex: The role of puberty in cortical maturation (Delevich et al., 2021)

Medical Ethics

Due to increasing evidence of harm, several republican dominated states are banning pediatric transition. These laws will be challenged, and this will be a legal battle in the United States for a long time. Health Query does not involve itself in legal battles currently. But we believe it is better for medical ethics board reviews to curtail pediatric transition rather than legislatures. Or, in this case, where the state is merely enforcing existing laws.-

https://twitter.com/agandrewbailey/status/1637882764706848773?s=46&t=_nlFr-A1tHVIfNQH-_MaeA

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1637882764706848773.html

Given institutions are caving to activist pressure in the internet age; this is not going to happen at the higher levels or in liberal states anytime soon. Liberal states are making themselves "sanctuary states" for gender affirmative care,” for runaways, parents who want to medicalize their child, or parents in custody disputes.

Sweden, Finland, the UK, and Norway are countries that are now revieing evidence or curtailing the practice.

Damage From Puberty Blockers

Articles about the dangers of giving puberty blockers to kids-

”New report describes dangers of giving Lupron to kids”

“Use of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs in Children: Update by an International Consortium ‘My body is on fire’: Ga. woman blames drug for pain, sues maker” (Krishna et al., 2019):

Lupron was originally Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved to treat prostate cancer, but it’s now routinely prescribed for other conditions such as endometriosis and “precocious puberty” — i.e., puberty that begins too early (generally considered under age eight for girls, under age nine for boys). Many of these patients have experienced extreme side effects that shattered their health and their lives, including severe joint pain, osteoporosis, compromised immune systems, and mental health issues such as severe depression and even suicidal ideation. The FDA has received 24,000 reports of adverse reactions, about half of which the agency has deemed serious.

”More women come forward with complaints about Lupron side effects” (suicidal thoughts as a side effect which may be of concern when given to troubled tweens and teens)

Conclusive evidence transitioning male tweens permanently destroys their sexual function

Doctors have permanently destroyed the sexual function of all or most males they puberty-blocked in Tanner stage 2. They will likely experience permanent anorgasmia. Below are WPATH members admitting to this. This is likely due to both the child-like state of the genitalia and the impacts on brain wiring when doctors severely interfere with the pubertal process. Marcie Bowers, a trans-identified heterosexual male, is a vaginoplasty surgeon. Bowers performs experimental and complicated surgeries on minors. The surgery is difficult due to the genital stunting induced by the puberty blockers. 

https://twitter.com/DonovanCleckley/status/1521625518394773505?s=20:

Every single child, or adolescent, who was truly blocked at Tanner stage 2 [by age 11] has never experienced orgasm. I mean, it’s really about zero.

Jazz Jennings was a victim of this effect and a botched vaginoplasty that needed 3 revision surgeries. Bower’s admits in the video that this is detrimental to relationships due to Bower’s experience in dealing with victims of female genital mutilation:

The lack of being able to be intimate with a partner is very important.

This is the sexual lobotomization of children at a stage where they are pre-sexual. Gender Health Query believes this is a human rights crime. Children cannot consent to permanently destroyed sexual function before any sexual experiences. There are no serious calls among “affirmative model” advocates to delay puberty blockers to preserve sexual function, only prescriptions for parents to tell their 10-13 year olds to “masturbate more” before the chemical castration process begins, if even that.

More proof of bone density loss

Major bone mass accrual happens in puberty and then is lost as we age. The problems of reducing bone mass accrual in puberty is obvious.

Endocrinologist Will Malone:

Jesse Singal posted an interview with Swedish journalist Carolina Jemsby, who has been reporting on the negative fallout from pediatric medical transition in her country and Karolinska hospital specifically. Sweden is curtailing pediatric transition due to damage resulting from it. The journalist states one 15 yr old has such a severely damaged spine the youth can’t stand up for more than 20 minutes without pain. The journalist said there were other recorded injuries from using hormone blockers and that the doctors seemed very motivated to avoid tracking harm and taking it seriously.

”A Swedish Investigative Journalist Talks About The Youth Gender Medicine Scandal She Helped Uncover At One Of The World's Top Hospitals”

Other articles indicating bone loss due to puberty blockers-

”Pubertal Suppression, Bone Mass, and Body Composition in Youth With Gender Dysphoria” (Navabi et al., 2021)

”Revisiting the effect of GnRH analogue treatment on bone mineral density in young adolescents with gender dysphoria” (Biggs, 2021)

”Hormone Agonist Therapy Disrupts Bone Density in Transgender Youth”

”The Effect of Puberty Blockers on the Accrual of Bone Mass- After two years, up to a third of children have abnormally low bone density”

”Evidence review: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues for children and adolescents with gender dysphoria”

”Puberty blockers for gender dysphoria: the science is far from settled” (Malone et al., 2021):

 The Karolinska Institute in Sweden, long considered gold-standard in providing transgender health care, no longer uses puberty blockers;6 nor does Finland promote their use.7 Additionally, a judicial review in the UK found puberty blockers to be an inappropriate option for most children younger than 16 years. 8 We urge The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health to take this opportunity to engage with this issue, rather than publishing, in our opinion, inaccurate and careless Editorials.

”Puberty blockers revealed to be dangerous for minors: study

”Puberty blockers ‘stunt bone growth of children”’

We cannot verify the validity of the statements on the r/detrans subreddit below. But it provides insight into how this may be impacting young people in the real world.

https://www.reddit.com/r/detrans/comments/mbmm7x/lupron_side_effects/: 

Brain bleeds and vision loss

 ”FDA Updates Safety Labels for Group of GnRH Agonists”:

Some children who have received GnRH therapies have experienced pseudotumor cerebri, which results in elevated spinal fluid pressure in the brain. This can lead to progressive loss of vision.

Puberty blockers use my increase the likelihood of depression

”Puberty blockers do not alleviate negative thoughts in children with gender dysphoria, finds study” (Dyer, 2021)

The Daily Wire is a conservative website that holds anti-LGB views we oppose, but author Christina Buttons is not of those opinions. We must cite these sources due to the widespread denialism that there are severe dangers to the “affirmative model” in legacy media.

”Animal Study Found Puberty Blockers May Cause Depression — Decades After Doctors Began Administering To Children”:

The results found that treatment with leuprolide, the drug used to suppress puberty, had “profound effects” of increased depression in female mice; in male mice, increased stress and a loss of interest in female mice were reported.

From the study Behavioral and neurobiological effects of GnRH agonist treatment in mice-potential implications for puberty suppression in transgender individuals” (Anacker et al., 2021):

Our behavioral and neurobiological characterization reveals for the first time that chronic leuprolide treatment, starting after the onset of puberty, exerts sex-specific effects on social preference, despair-like behavior and hyponeophagia, neuroendocrine responses to mild stress, and hyperactivity of the [dentate gyrus], a crucial neurobiological regulator of stress responses in mice.

 And:

In conclusion, we report that chronic leuprolide treatment in mice has profound effects on female behaviors that are commonly interpreted as depression-like, as well as on neural activity in the hippocampus—a brain region crucially involved in stress processing, depression, and cognition,” the discussion section read.

While these mood-related effects are specific to females, leuprolide causes pronounced differences in locomotion and social preference in males and increases neuroendocrine responses to mild stress,” the researchers added.

Back to the Daily Wire news article (emphasis ours):

Dr. Claudia Gennari, an internist and researcher, believes the negative psychiatric outcomes found in this study have huge implications for pediatric gender medicine.

This study was long overdue and should bring pause to clinicians treating children with puberty blockers because it shows sex-specific neuropsychological changes caused by this medication,” Gennari told The Daily Wire.  

This strongly suggests GnRH agonists are not a ‘pause’ button at all and its use can cause negative effects on cognition, behavior, and coping skills,” she added.

Puberty blockers likely increases persistence

Affirmative model advocates have effectively promoted the “true trans” narrative and social and medical transition as healthy and safe to the public because they are heavily invested in the protocol they encourage. For example, one can find very ideological language written in the Dutch study below, indicating most children/teens who go on puberty blockers persist and go on to transition.

”Continuation of gender-affirming hormones in transgender people starting puberty suppression in adolescence: a cohort study in the Netherlands” (van Der Loos et al., 2022) (emphasis ours):

Most participants who started gender-affirming hormones in adolescence continued this treatment into adulthood. The continuation of treatment is reassuring considering the worries that people who started treatment in adolescence might discontinue gender-affirming treatment.

There is no reason to state this is reassuring. The only way to glean the effects of social and medical transition on minors would be to have a control group of youth who are loved and supported but aided in getting through a healthy puberty and, perhaps, young adulthood until maturation at age 25. It is logical to consider that adding chemicals that strongly affect the brains of growing adolescents may affect their identity development and choices. Stating it is “reassuring” almost all go on to transition is purely ideological on their part and inappropriate for science researchers.

This translates to biased reporting in the media and a propagandized public. Journalists rarely asks why almost all kids are going on to transition. This is the case with the NPR article ”Most teens who start puberty suppression continue gender- affirming care, study finds,” a source that should be unbiased. This enables apathy about what appears to be increasing persistence.

This part of the study indicates transitioning minors increases persistence. Or it may mean they were more dysphoric from childhood, and those who “come out” later are at more risk of regret:

People who started hormones as minors had higher continuation rate than people who started as adults 74.4% (66.0%-82.8%) vs 64.4% (56.0%-72.8%).

In this study the females were likelier to abandon hormone treatment than the males, concerning given the explosion in trans identity in females:

Transfeminine individuals had a higher continuation rate than transmasculine individuals 81.0% (72.0%-90.0%) vs 64.4% (56.0%-72.8%).

Case reports of desistance post puberty blockers

This is a relevant thread on the r/detrans Subreddit. Several of the young people desisted or detransitioned after the use of puberty blockers.

Has anyone here been put on puberty blockers? How has that affected you?:

yes, i was on lupron and testosterone for 11 months starting from the month after i turned 14 to right as i was turning 15. my breasts definitely shrunk a lot (below an a cup) but generally returned slowly, although they never were that big to begin with. i’m now almost 16 and i got my period six and a half months after i started detransitioning. in my opinion blockers shouldn’t be used on minors (in gender transition cases.) another note, the endo that prescribed me lupron did a ‘puberty test’ (i believe it’s the tanner scale test?) except rather than just peeking at my clit development, she squeezed and poked my nipples and stared at my clit with nobody else in the room. this was meant to be preparation for puberty blockers but having read up on this procedure afterwards she definitely was going against the rules of it. on the bright side, i did make it out alive and i am doing generally okay now, at least much better than i was. i think that puberty blockers (or t, or a combination) caused me severe dissociation during the time i was taking them as i had very little coherent thought, i feel as if once i started them i just kind of checked out in terms of life. once i went off both my sense of self returned and i have a level head. :)

The evidence for puberty blockers reducing suicide risk is weak to nonexistent.

Despite a strong drive to promote “affirmative care,” and thus puberty blockers, as “lifesaving,” the evidence for this claim is not strong.

”Researchers Found Puberty Blockers And Hormones Didn’t Improve Trans Kids’ Mental Health At Their Clinic. Then They Published A Study Claiming The Opposite”

”Puberty Blockers and Suicidality in Adolescents Suffering from Gender Dysphoria” (Biggs, 2020):

A report regarding GIDS Early Intervention Study (beginning in 2011) found there was no overall improvement in mood or psychological wellbeing using standardized psychological measures

Tavistock’s Experimentation with Puberty Blockers: Scrutinizing the Evidence

Reasons not to sexually lobotomize and sterilize youth

As we have pointed out in the original Topic #2 article, many trans people want sex lives and to have children.

In the Heterodorx podcast by Nina Paley and trans-identified Corinna Cohn, they talk about the sexual orientation of GAMP. Corrina states that males who want to be females who don’t get bottom surgery are in much higher demand than those who have had it. While there is an unfortunate amount of exploitation of trans people by “chasers,” we believe that males who have this sexual orientation, best described as a type of bisexuality, should facilitate healthier relationships with feminine males with less drastic, expensive, and health-damaging surgeries. Minors cannot weigh the cost of “passing better” to invasive and health-damaging and sexuality-damaging medical procedures.

Episode 42: GAMPs, Pr0n, trans, and the Conservation of Evil

There are more stories of lawsuits from people angry they are now sterilized as a requirement for transition proving fertility is of great importance to many. The same thing is happening in Sweden.

”Transgender Germans seek compensation after forced sterilisation”

Random PB studies

We consider the below study to be poor quality.

”Review: Puberty blockers for transgender and gender diverse youth—a critical review of the literature” (Rew et al., 2020)

We have demonstrated there is weak evidence for the “lifesaving care” claim they make in they make in their conclusion. They also include Jack Turban, who does poor quality research. One study has one participant. And they do not clearly state their search criteria.

The below study on delayed puberty due to congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Kallmann syndrome) may provide some insights into side effects from delaying puberty in youth.

”Psychosexual effects resulting from delayed, incomplete, or absent puberty” (Dwyer, 2020)

Conflicts of interest in puberty blocker studies

From an article in The Post Millennial, Maker of puberty blockers funded original study that led to 'gender-affirming care' for minors: Dutch investigative report”:

A Dutch investigative report has revealed that the 2006 study upon which the entire medical experiment of child sex changes is based was funded by a maker of puberty blockers.

 The NRC article, published on Dec 31, takes aim at the treatment approach known as the "Dutch protocol," which involves blocking the puberty of adolescents who are suffering from gender dysphoria and forms the basis for the "gender-affirming care" model adopted by pediatric gender clinics all over the world.

 ”Ook transzorg moet aan medisch-wetenschappelijke standaarden voldoen”

Another article on Ferring Pharmaceuticals’ involvement in Transgendertrend-

“‘They Look Normal’ – The Case For Puberty Blockers:

I would want to know why a drug company, Ferring, sponsored the crucial Dutch trial into puberty blockers: the 2006 Delemarre-van de Waal and Cohen-Kettenis paper was ‘presented at the 4th Ferring Pharmaceuticals International Paediatric Endocrinology Symposium, Paris (2006)’ and Ferring Pharmaceuticals supported the publication of these proceedings.’

”Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK” (Carmichael et al., 2021) Almost all youth put on blockers persisted and went onto cross-sex hormones and there seemed to be no psychological improvements:

Treatment of young people with persistent and severe GD aged 12–15 years with GnRHa was efficacious in suppressing pubertal progression. Anticipated effects of withdrawal of sex hormones on symptoms were common and there were no unexpected adverse events. BMD increased with treatment in the lumbar spine and was stable at the hip, and BMD z-score fell consistent with delay of puberty. Overall participant experience of changes on GnRHa treatment was positive. We identified no changes in psychological function, quality of life or degree of gender dysphoria.

”Thrombosis Risk in Transgender Adolescents Receiving Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy” (Mullins, 2021)

This study has a very short window of time, so is not particularly relevant for health effects. There are also conflicts of interest because it’s funded by the makers of puberty blocker Leuprorelin.

Sex Hormone effects

Brain effects

While issues such as depression affect cognitive health, the bad news about brain health in trans individuals is likely due to taking large doses of cross-sex hormones, yet they seem unwilling to focus on this question in the below article.

”’Alarming' Data on Early Cognitive Decline in Transgender Adults”

Cross-sex hormones affect the brain structure of males and females. Adults may be desirous of these changes, but adolescents' brains are not fully formed, nor is their understanding of themselves.

”Cross-sex hormones alter grey matter structures” (Holmes, 2016):

Analysis of brain structures revealed volume changes predominantly in MtF individuals, particularly in the hippocampus — a region involved in neurogenesis and neuronal plasticity. Specifically, oestradiol plus anti-androgen treatment reduced hippocampal volume in MtF individuals, which was accompanied by a global increase in ventricular structures. Moreover, reduced plasma levels of progesterone in MtF individuals correlated with reductions in grey matter structures in the right hippocampus and right caudate. "These structural changes are associated with aging and Alzheimer's does this and so does estrogen...

Fertility effects

Fertility concerns of the transgender patient (Cheng et al., 2019)

Testosterone therapy in transgender men can suppress ovulation and alter ovarian histology, while estrogen therapy in transgender women can lead to impaired spermatogenesis and testicular atrophy.

Bone effects

The below study review study ran into major problems due to lack of consistency in study designs but did find trans-identified males may have lower bone mineral density.

”Systematic Review of the Long-Term Effects of Transgender Hormone Therapy on Bone Markers and Bone Mineral Density and Their Potential Effects in Implant Therapy” (Delgado-Ruiz et al., 2019)

A review indicating dysphoric people do want children-

”Desire for children and fertility preservation in transgender and gender-diverse people: A systematic review” (Stolk et al., 2023):

The majority of TGD people expressed a desire for children. Fertility preservation utilization rates were low as there are many barriers to pursue fertility preservation.

Circulatory effects-both sexes

”Hormone therapy for gender dysphoria may raise cardiovascular risks”

”Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Myocardial Infarction in the Transgender Population” (Alzahrani et al., 2019):

Conclusions: The transgender population had a higher reported history of myocardial infarction in comparison to the cisgender population, except for transgender women compared with cisgender men, even after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors.

”Hormone therapy for gender dysphoria may raise cardiovascular risks”

”Assessing and Addressing Cardiovascular Health in People Who Are Transgender and Gender Diverse”

In addition, the use of gender-affirming hormone therapy may be associated with cardiometabolic changes, but health research in this area remains limited and, at times, contradictory.

The study below shows a decrease in blood pressure for trans-identified males but an increase for trans-identified females.

”Blood Pressure Effects of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adults” (Banks et al., 2021)

Estrogen specific effects

This post is from a parent of a trans-identified person and not a medical review. But it contains some valuable and in depth information in greater detail than covered here.-

”As the debate over transgender care rages on, we know one thing for sure: estrogen is terrible for men”:

Most transgender care providers will mention venous thromboembolism or VTE as the predominant risk from estrogen, but research in the past few years indicates that its effect on the brain is at least as scary.

Giving male tweens and teens puberty blockers and estrogen likely has significant influences on their brain development, including brain volume shrinkage in some areas.

Effects of adult male rat feminization treatments on brain morphology and metabolomic profile (Gómez et al., 2020):

These results reveal, for the first time to our knowledge, that the volumetric decreases observed in trans women under cross-sex hormone treatment can be reproduced in a rat model. Estrogens are more potent drivers of brain changes in male rats than anti-androgen treatment.

The study ”Psychosocial Functioning in Transgender Youth after 2 Years of Hormones” (Chen et al., 2023) showed some improvement with HRT for females, but not males. We fear estrogen in males may be associated with depression.- 

“Increased estrogen level can be associated with depression in males” (Stanikova, et al., 2018)

Posting relevant quotes from ”Health considerations for transgender women and remaining unknowns: a narrative review” (Iwamoto et al., 2019)-

Some dysphoric people will obtain hormones from black market sources. Attempts to outright ban this practice for adults will fuel this phenomenon:

When barriers prevent trans people from obtaining GAHT from a licensed medical provider, they may search for other sources. Previous reports stated that 4.7–24% of TW have obtained hormones from friends,4446 and 2–70% have purchased them online.47 Anecdotally, some TW who utilize services at the Ghent University Hospital Transgender Infopunt have admitted to using OCPs obtained from their female partners. The use of GAHT obtained from nonmedical sources varies from 23% in a United Kingdom sample of trans people referred to a gender clinic,47 to 26.8% in a community-based questionnaire in people who self-identified as trans in Canada,45 to 48.0% in a Belgian sample of trans sex workers44 and as high as 63% in urban groups of TW in New York City.46 

 Regarding BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is involved in neurogenesis, neuronal maturation and synaptogenesis, influencing brain plasticity. A study of 10 TW from Belgium showed a significant decrease in BDNF levels after 12 months of GAHT (p = 0.014) independent of age, weight, BMI, total fat mass, total lean mass, LH, FSH, oestradiol, testosterone, cortisol, physical activity or smoking.231Therefore, it was concluded that the decreased BDNF in TW after GAHT resulted from the GAHT rather than as a consequence of or risk factor for gender identity.231

This study is concerning given BDNF is important to brain health and function and is relevant to the aging process.

”Cross-sex hormone treatment in male-to-female transsexual persons reduces serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Fuss et al., 2015)

Reduced serum BDNF in MtF thus seems to be a result of hormonal treatment rather than a consequence or risk factor of transsexualism. 

Testosterone specific effects

Genital and pelvic pain are common with testosterone use.

Studies indicate testosterone use in trans-identified females indicates pelvic pain is the norm-

”Pelvic pain and persistent menses in transgender men” (Obedin-Maliver, 2016)

”Pelvic Pain in Transgender People Using Testosterone Therapy” (Zwickl, 2023) :

Results: Among 486 participants (median age = 27 years), 351 (72.42%) reported experiencing pelvic pain following initiation of testosterone therapy, described most commonly as in the suprapubic region and as ‘‘cramping.’’ Median duration of testosterone therapy was 32 months. Persistent menstruation, current or previous history of post-traumatic stress disorder, and experiences of pain with orgasm were associated with higher odds of pelvic pain after testosterone therapy.

 In the same study also 63% reported painful orgasm; 58% pain during penetrative sex, and 31 % pain on touching external genitalia.

Severe clitoral pain is a known side effect of testosterone use in females:

 “I Thought I Was Saving Trans Kids. Now I’m Blowing the Whistle”:

Other girls were disturbed by the effects of testosterone on their clitoris, which enlarges and grows into what looks like a microphallus, or a tiny penis. I counseled one patient whose enlarged clitoris now extended below her vulva, and it chafed and rubbed painfully in her jeans. I advised her to get the kind of compression undergarments worn by biological men who dress to pass as female. At the end of the call I thought to myself, “Wow, we hurt this kid.”

 Thinning of the vaginal wall is another side effect for testosterone use in females. Also from the same article:

How little patients understood what they were getting into was illustrated by a call we received at the center in 2020 from a 17-year-old biological female patient who was on testosterone. She said she was bleeding from the vagina. In less than an hour she had soaked through an extra heavy pad, her jeans, and a towel she had wrapped around her waist. The nurse at the center told her to go to the emergency room right away.

Testosterone significantly alters brain structures. While adult trans-identified females may desire these changes, it points to the fact that when tweens, teens, and young adults take testosterone, they may be altering the way their brain works and their personality significantly. And probably much more so, as brain development is not complete until age 25.

”Testosterone affects language areas of the adult human brain” (Hahn et al., 2016)

”Research shows testosterone changes brain structures in female-to-male transsexuals”

”Testosterone Effects on the Brain in Transgender Men” (Burke et al., 2018)

”The Effects of Testosterone on the Brain of Transgender Men” (Zubiaurre-Elorza et al., 2021)

”Gender-affirming hormonal treatment changes neural processing of emotions in trans men: An fMRI study” (Kiyar et al., 2020)

”Testosterone effects on functional amygdala lateralization: A study in adolescent transgender boys and cisgender boys and girls” (Becking et al., 2019)

Other side effects

”Erythrocytosis in a Large Cohort of Trans Men Using Testosterone: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study on Prevalence, Determinants, and Exposure Years”

Regarding the above study, a doctor wrote a letter to the editor and believed the researchers under reported the risk to females from testosterone induced erythrocytosis for political reasons. This is discussed for the general public in this Breitbart article, a paper with a conservative bias. But it is difficult to get more liberal leaning news sites to discuss risks:

Males and females have different laboratory ranges for hematocrit (red blood cells).
For adult men the range is 38.3 to 48.6 percent.
For adult women the range is 35.5 to 44.9 percent.
High testosterone levels can directly cause high levels of hematocrit.
Females who identify as trans males are given very high doses of testosterone to attempt to bring their testosterone levels into the male range.

“Women who identify as trans males are being given very high, very risky doses of testosterone,” Laidlaw explained to Breitbart News about his concerns. “These high doses lead to high red blood cell counts. High red blood cell counts can lead to heart attacks and death. We believe these risks are being hidden.”

“Males and females have different normal ranges for red blood cell counts,” he elaborated. “We believe that the authors’ use of the male range for females hides a large number of females who will be at risk for heart disease and death.”

 Laidlaw and colleagues, Andre Van Mol, M.D., Quentin Van Meter, M.D., and Jeffrey E Hansen, Ph.D., note results of the 1994 landmark Framingham study which showed “having high red blood cell counts (erythrocytosis) puts females at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease and death due to both.”

 “Studies of trans males have already shown up to a nearly five fold increased risk of myocardial infarction compared to females not taking testosterone,” the doctors explain at Gender Sanity…

The Swedish study, ”Lack of data hamper a proper toxicological risk assessment of the off-label use of testosterone in women with gender dysphoria” (Svens et al., 2021) summarizes the issues and calls for more research:

And:

Conclusions

Off-label use of testosterone in transmen has some unique characteristics, making it inherently riskier. High dose treatment is life-long and preclinical and clinical safety assessment studies performed for testosterone drugs lack the whole female group data as testosterone use is contraindicated in females due to teratogenicity. In addition, adverse effects related to off-label testosterone use in transmen is under-reported reported and is a possible patient safety risk. The lack of toxicology data would not be accepted for a new drug and the need for a comprehensive risk assessment is urgent.

Impacts on height

One goal of interfering with dysphoric youths’ natural puberty was likely to influence height to be more in line with the cross-sex identification. This area needs more research, but pediatric transition does not appear to achieve this. Puberty blocker use may stunt growth. In an interview with the Swedish journalist Carolina Jemsby, she states that some of the females who were put on puberty blockers were shorter than expected due to osteopenia.

Timing may be relevant because another study indicates they catch up when put on testosterone. T use in females may reverse stunted height due to puberty blockers and slightly increase an average for females. They will still, on average, be short for men and their bones stand a chance of being weaker than normal as the study below indicates.

”Just as Tall on Testosterone; a Neutral to Positive Effect on Adult Height of GnRHa and Testosterone in Trans Boys” (Willemsen, 2023) 

We expect affirmative model doctors to start giving females human growth hormone, despite possible negative impacts. Doctors consider this for short youth as seen in the study below.

”Should Skeletal Maturation Be Manipulated for Extra Height Gain?” (Wit, 2021)

Puberty blockers do not appear to reduce male height. Starting them on puberty blockers earlier may cause them to be taller than they would have been. This negates justification for this practice on such young male children.

”Development of Hip Bone Geometry During Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender Adolescents Resembles That of the Experienced Gender When Pubertal Suspension Is Started in Early Puberty” (van der Loos et al., 2021)

Transgender Adolescents Resembles That of the Experienced Gender When Pubertal Suspension Is Started in Early Puberty (van der Loos et al., 2021):

Why would they be taller if they take puberty blockers early? Perhaps it is due to their influence on growth plates. This is from Australian guidelines, and they should not use the term female to describe biological males in medical literature. It’s purely ideological, confusing, and irresponsible:

Some trans females may also be distressed by linear growth beyond their expected final height due to delayed growth plate closure with oestrogen and testosterone deficiency. 

However, the Dutch clinicians may use this study to justify puberty blocker use early merely because it influences the hip geometry to be closer to the opposite sex:

In both trans women and trans men, participants resembled the reference curve for SPW and ED of the experienced gender but only when GnRHa was started during early puberty. Those who started during mid and late puberty remained within the reference curve of the gender assigned at birth.

Another study indicates they may give them massive doses of estradiol because it slightly reduces height. One can see the results are very small, indicating this process cannot eradicate male genetics.

”Transgender Girls Grow Tall: Adult Height Is Unaffected by GnRH Analogue and Estradiol Treatment” (Boogers et al., 2020):

Results

Growth velocity and bone maturation decreased during GnRHa, but increased during GAHT. Adult height after regular-dose treatment was 180.4 ± 5.6 cm, which was 1.5 cm below PAH at the start GnRHa (95% CI, 0.2 cm to 2.7 cm), and close to target height (–1.1 cm; 95% CI, –2.5 cm to 0.3 cm). Compared to regular-dose treatment, high-dose estradiol and EE reduced adult height by 0.9 cm (95% CI, –0.9 cm to 2.8 cm) and 3.0 cm (95% CI, 0.2 cm to 5.8 cm), respectively.

Growth decelerated during GnRHa and accelerated during GAHT. After regular-dose treatment, adult height was slightly lower than predicted at start of GnRHa, likely due to systematic overestimation of PAH as described in boys from the general population, but not significantly different from target height. High-dose EE resulted in greater reduction of adult height than high-dose estradiol, but this needs to be weighed against possible adverse effects.

How do these hormones affect height? Growth will continue on PBs, but bone maturation slows due to a lack of sex hormones. But growth plate closure is delayed. When testosterone and estrogen are reintroduced, growth velocity increases and leads to bone maturation. If sex hormones are given in high doses (as is the case at gender clinics), it will quickly close growth plate growth. Genetics, human growth hormone (natural and prescribed), puberty blockers, and sex steroids can all influence height. Their interactions are very complicated and influenced by the timing of treatments. But overall, they have not proved this process significantly impacts more desirable height ranges.

Phalloplasty and Metoidioplasty

Both of these procedures (especially phalloplasty) have very high complication rates, with many being severe, even life-threatening. The study below covers some side effects of metoidioplasty, a surgery result that does not function like a male penis but is less risky than phalloplasty.

”Metoidioplasty Risks and Complications”

Stats from 2 studies-

Metoidioplasty: Surgical Options and Outcomes in 813 Cases (Bordas et al., 2021):

Follow-up ranged from 16 to 180 months (mean 94 months). Mean surgery time was 170 minutes and mean hospital stay was 3 days. Length of the neophallus ranged from 4.8 cm to 10.2 cm (mean 5.6 cm). Urethroplasty was complication-free in 89.5% of cases, and ranged between 81% to 90.3% in different groups. Urethral fistula and stricture occured in 8.85% and 1.70% of cases, respectively. Other complications included testicular implant rejection in 2%, testicular displacement in 3.20% and vaginal remnant in 9.60% of cases. From 655 patients who answered the questionnaire, 79% were totally satisfied and 20% mainly satisfied with the result of surgery. All patients reported voiding in standing position and good sexual arousal of the neophallus, without possibility for penetrative intercourse due to small size of the neophallus.

Overview on metoidioplasty: variants of the technique (Bizic et al., 2020):

Complications occurring after metoidioplasty are less frequent than in currently used phalloplasty techniques, ranging from 10 to 47% according to different literature data, and are mostly related to urethral reconstruction [12, 15, 24, 32].

Vaginoplasty

”Fancy a vaginoplasty? Think again” is an article discussing the lack of ethics and high complication rate of vaginoplasty:

I have seen horrific unethical practices by surgeons who lie about their experience and horrific results surgically as a result of that. We are using trans-gender people as guinea pigs and the medical profession allows this to happen,” said one doctor.

Other Surgeries

High complication rate with laryngoplasty-

”Gender-Affirming Laryngoplasty: Complications Relatively Common”

Cardiac/Circulatory Effects

There is not a complete picture in the literature regarding heart attack risk and strokes in people taking cross sex hormones. But evidence suggests there may be significant increased risks. From heart.org:

Previous research shows transgender men were almost 5 times as likely to report having a heart attack compared to cisgender women, those whose personal identity aligns with their sex at birth. Conversely, transgender women were more than 2 1/2 times more likely to have reported a heart attack than cisgender women – yet they did not have a significant increase in heart attack incidence when compared with cisgender men. However, a 2020 analysis found most of the studies examining gender-affirming hormones and blood pressure had sample sizes that were too small to detect statistically significant differences in blood pressure.

And from ”Hormone therapy for gender dysphoria may raise cardiovascular risks”:

The current study is the largest to date examining the cardiovascular risks of gender affirmation therapy in this historically understudied population. Previous research on hormone-modulating medications has primarily focused on younger women using hormone-based birth control or on older women following a hysterectomy or during menopause. In these populations, long-term hormone replacement therapy has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, stroke and blood clots…

In the study, people with gender dysphoria who had ever used hormone replacements saw nearly seven times the risk of ischemic stroke (a blockage in a vessel supplying blood to the brain), nearly six times the risk of ST elevation myocardial infarction (the most serious type of heart attack) and nearly five times the risk of pulmonary embolism (a blockage in an artery in the lung), compared with people with gender dysphoria who had never used hormone replacements. Hormone replacement therapy was not associated with any increase in deaths from any cause or with increased rates of atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, hemorrhagic stroke or heart failure.

Effects regarding reproductive cancers, fertility, and future offspring

Many trans-identified females want a hysterectomy to avoid pregnancy, breakthrough periods, and cancer risks. Little information is available regarding the impacts on fetuses. There are cases of females on T getting pregnant accidentally (sure to have hormonal influences on the fetus) and planning to get pregnant and stop testosterone.

”Endometrial findings among transgender and gender nonbinary people using testosterone at the time of gender-affirming hysterectomy” (Hawkins et al., 2021) indicates testosterone use affects the endometrial lining which may not revert if the female stops the testosterone use. Currently there appears to be no concern among affirmitve care providers regarding how this may impact babies via bith defects. Steroid use is known to cause them.

These researchers assert that “transphobia” contributes to pelvic pain due to testosterone use in the study “P088Uterine cramping and bleeding in transgender and nonbinary individuals on gender-affirming testosterone therapy” (Sobieraj et al, 2022).

Mastectomy & Binding Side Effects

It appears that post-surgical pain is very common for double mastectomies.

From cancer.org:

Studies have shown that between 20% and 30% of women develop symptoms of PMPS after surgery. It's most common after operations that remove tissue in the upper outside portion of the breast or the underarm area.

Phantom breast sensation appears to be a side effect, according to the article The phantom breast after mastectomy, the homunculus and the hole in the cortical map.” (Dutta, 2015)

Binding is not safe, especially for the body of a growing adolescent, as demonstrated in the study ”Health impact of chest binding among transgender adults: a community-engaged, cross-sectional study” (Peitzmeier et al., 2015):

Over 97% reported at least one of 28 negative outcomes attributed to binding.

However, many “LGBTQ” youth websites promote, even celebrate the practice.

Extreme Body Modification for any Identity

The medical industry is becoming a service provider for what has turned into a capitalist body modification movement, but it is tax payers and insurance companies (paid for for all who have it) who will cover the expenses.

Outspoken and well-known affirmative model leaders such as Dr. Michelle Telfer are willing to put people on puberty suppression indefinitely for nonbinary identities. This case study involves a youth who identifies as nonbinary and has been on puberty blockers since age 11 and, at age 18, still wanted to be on puberty blockers. Doctors have kept this individual in a child-like, prepubertal state physically and likely mentally.

“Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults” (Notini et al., 2020) (emphasis ours):

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the novel case of Phoenix, a non-binary adult requesting ongoing puberty suppression (OPS) to permanently prevent the development of secondary sex characteristics, as a way of affirming their gender identity. We argue that (1) the aim of OPS is consistent with the proper goals of medicine to promote well-being, and therefore could ethically be offered to non-binary adults in principle; (2) there are additional equity-based reasons to offer OPS to non-binary adults as a group; and (3) the ethical defensibility of facilitating individual requests for OPS from non-binary adults also depends on other relevant considerations, including the balance of potential benefits over harms for that specific patient, and whether the patient’s request is substantially autonomous.

Hormones, particularly estrogen, are critical for bone density. As people enter their thirties, bone density begins to decrease. If kept on puberty blockers, this person will be at risk for weakened bones and fractures. Many other areas of the body require a normal balance of hormones for healthy function, and what are healthy levels are sex-specific.

The later part of the abstract demonstrates that gender medicine is a product provided based on the patient demands. This removes guard rails to protect people from medically assisted self-harm. Failure to adhere to these ethics has led to unnecessary cosmetic surgery by people with body dysmorphic disorder and widespread opiate addiction.

Although the broadly principlist ethical approach we take can be used to analyse other cases of non-binary adults requesting OPS apart from the case we evaluate, we highlight that the outcome will necessarily depend on the individual’s context and values. However, such clinical provision of OPS should ideally be within the context of a properly designed research study with long-term follow-up and open publication of results.

Other studies regarding this subject-

”Partial Gender-Affirming Hormone Treatment in Non-Binary Transgender Individuals in a Referral Center Cohort” (Van Dijken et al., 2021)

”Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: A Potential Option For Non-Binary Gender-Affirming Hormonal Care?” (Xu et al., 2012):

Here, we discuss the theoretical use of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) for non-binary people assigned male at birth (AMAB) who are seeking an androgynous appearance through partial feminization without breast growth.

Case reports

”Androgen-receptor-positive hepatocellular carcinoma in a transgender teenager taking exogenous testosterone” (Lin et al, 2020)

”Implications for management of ovarian cancer in a transgender man: Impact of androgens and androgen receptor status” (Aubrey et al., 2021)

”Case Report: Invasive Endometrial Cancer in a Trans Man and Risk of Testosterone Therapy” (Jeevananthan et al., 2021)

”Management of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis in a Transgender Woman” (Oguz et al., 2021)

Conclusion

Corinna Cohn, is a trans-identified person who discusses gender and other issues on the Heterodox podcast. This statement provides a good sumation of the longterm risks and challenges that young people who medicalize will face.

TOPIC UPDATES FOR 2023: TOPIC 1- DO CHILDREN & TEENS WITH SERIOUS GENDER DYSPHORIA EVER DESIST FROM THE DYSPHORIA. YES

Topic Updates for 2023: TOPIC 1 (Part 2)

Original Topic Post= 1) DO CHILDREN & TEENS WITH SERIOUS GENDER DYSPHORIA EVER DESIST FROM THE DYSPHORIA. YES

We are updating our Topics in 2023 with the most recent and relevant information regarding over-medicalized youth and identity confusion due to queer theory/gender ideology. Since the launch of our website in 2019, only more information has come to light validating our view that pediatric transition is dangerous for children and teens. We support honest and open inquiries regarding this topic. Our focus relates to protecting lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth from harm, and we want the best long-term health outcomes for all youth, regardless of identity or orientation.

One of the main reasons why LGB people are so concerned about the move to transition cognitively immature minors socially and medically is that they may desist from wanting to be the opposite sex or find less invasive ways to cope. Desistance/persistence research is very relevant to protecting LGB and other youth from the culture, parents, and health professionals tracking them into medical pathways they otherwise may avoid if given proper support and allowed to mature.

The increasing but unproven narrative in the “gender affirmative” movement is that no therapy can resolve gender dysphoria, and social and medical transition are the only options. Here is a case study where an individual resolved gender dysphoria with therapy by addressing homophobia, making this study pertinent to the concerns of GHQ:

Behavioral treatment of transsexualism: A case report:

Patients who believe themselves to be transsexual seek only confirmation of their diagnosis so that they may proceed with their pre-chosen course of management: hormones and surgery. Their syntonic emotional set generates resistance to any other therapeutic direction. Despite this attitude, it is the therapist's responsibility to assess each case individually and to decide, with the patient, on realistic goals even if they be different from the original one. This case emphasizes this need since a probing history revealed underlying conflict and anxiety related to severe homophobia. With revelation of the homophobia, various behavioral techniques could be used therapeutically. These resulted in acceptance of lesbianism as a life style. Careful assessment of patients with self-diagnoses of transsexualism can sometimes uncover a different etiology to which appropriate therapy can be applied.

There is a critical study, Singh et al. (2021), called A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder. It shows high rates of desistance in boys with DSM-diagnosed gender dysphoria. Many desisters grew up to be gay men, as indicated in previous studies. The results- 139 participants, 17 (12.2%) were persisters, and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were desisters. This is a very high rate of desistance from a clinical diagnosis, thus involving some amount of distress. These were not just “boys who liked pink.”

It appears persisters on average will be the most “gender variant,” which is not surprising:

Compared to the reference group, the biphilic/androphilic persisters tended to be older at the time of the assessment in childhood, were from a lower social class background, and, on a dimensional composite of sex-typed behavior in childhood were more gender-variant. The biphilic/androphilic desisters were more gender-variant compared to the gynephilic desisters. Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The implications of the data for current models of care for the treatment of gender dysphoria in children are discussed.

But this doesn't mean no desisters fell into this range, given these are averages. In fact, many did. There was more detailed information in the dissertation by Devita Singh that was the basis for this paper. One measure of particular interest was a composite score of each subject's scores on several tests that may indicate more intense levels of dysphoria or gender nonconformity:

As can be seen from Table 15, the childhood sex-typed behavior measures on which the groups differed were significantly correlated.24 From these six measures (first drawn person on the Draw-a-Person, free play, Gender Identity Interview, cross-sex peer preference on the Playmate and Play Style Preferences Structured Interview, 21 cross-sex toy preference on the Playmate and Play Style Preferences Structured Interview, and the Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children), a composite score of childhood sex-typed behavior was derived for each participant by taking the average of the six variables 25 (each expressed as z-scores). Thus, the composite score was expressed as a z-score. A higher composite z-score indicates more cross-gender behavior at assessment (Fig. 2).

 We see that the differences between the Draw-a-Person test, was not significantly different between the persisters and homosexual desisters:

On the Draw-a-Person, there was one significant post-hoc contrast. The bisexual/ homosexual persisters were, on average, significantly more likely to draw a female first compared to the heterosexual desisters (p = .04). The comparison between the bisexual/ homosexual desisters and heterosexual desisters approached significance (p = .09), with the bisexual/homosexual desisters showing a greater tendency to draw a female first. The comparison between the bisexual/homosexual persisters and bisexual/homosexual desisters was not significant (p > .05)

Also:

The bisexual/homosexual persisters had a 274% increase in odds of having a higher composite score (i.e., more childhood cross-gender behavior)…

 And regarding desisters:

The bisexual/homosexual desisters had a 48% increase in odds of having a higher composite score compared to the heterosexual desisters.

We see that a significant number of homosexual desisters, a larger group than the persisters (N=66 v n=16), fell into the range of the persisters’ z-score. This is the population Gender Health Query is most concerned about, very gender nonconforming and cross-sex identified boy children, who now will be reinforced in body dissociation and possibly medicalized at puberty before testosterone exposure to their brains during the maturation process.

The paper discovers the most relevant variables, as seen below. Interestingly, lower socioeconomic status increases the likelihood of persistence, and they suggest these families may be more likely to have negative views of homosexuality and prefer a trans status in their child.

To evaluate the influence of childhood sex-typed behavior and demographic variables on group outcome at follow-up, a multinomial logistic regression was performed using the composite score and the demographic variables on which the groups differed26–age at assessment, IQ, and social class–as predictor variables. It can be seen from Table 16 that both social class and the composite score of childhood sex-typed behavior were significant predictors of group outcome at follow-up in the first model which compared the bisexual/ homosexual persisters to the bisexual/homosexual desisters

Dr. Ken Zucker stated on his twitter account the study has flaws but:

I think that this is the best follow-up study to date in terms of the sample size and the methods of assessment. It does, of course, have its flaws, but I think that the data speak for themselves.

See the entire thread here https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1376412138227503104.html

 Zucker notes in a tweet thread:

This will probably be the last follow-up study in the literature that tracks longer-term psychosexual development of children (i.e., those seen clinically for the first time between the ages of 3-12 years) during an era where "treatment"--when there was treatment--came in a...

variety of shapes and forms. But the one type of "treatment" (with one exception) that these children did not receive was what is now known as pre-pubertal social transition. Thus, this follow-up study can be used as a comparative benchmark with regard to the persistence and...

desistance of gender dysphoria for any new follow-up studies that look at persistence and desistance among children who socially transitioned prior to puberty. I have argued elsewhere (Zucker, 2018) and in the Discussion that pre-pubertal social transition (where it is...

implemented by parents, on their own, without any clinical input from "professionals" or at the suggestion of professionals, or in combination is a form of psychosocial treatment of gender dysphoria...just of a very different kind.

We did internet searches to see if any “LGBTQ” organizations such as the HRC, PFLAG, or The Trevor Project referenced this study, given they are recommending social and medical transition of children and teens. They have not, to our knowledge. We believe these entities have become a danger to pre-gay and lesbian youth despite putting LBG in their names. Their purpose is exclusively promoting the interests of current trans activism, medicalizing children/teens, and replacing sex-based rights in law with gender identity.

The high desistance rate in the above study that took place at a time when they were not being "affirmed" is in stark contrast to an extremely high persistence rate in a follow-up study by The Trans Youth Project regarding fully "affirmed" minors called “Gender Identity 5 Years After Social Transition.”

RESULTS
We found that an average of 5 years after their initial social transition, 7.3% of youth had retransitioned at least once. At the end of this period, most youth identified as binary transgender youth (94%), including 1.3% who retransitioned to another identity before returning to their binary transgender identity. A total of 2.5% of youth identified as cisgender and 3.5% as nonbinary. Later cisgender identities were more common among youth whose initial social transition occurred before age 6 years; their retransitions often occurred before age 10 years.

This paper will be discussed in more detail in an update to Topic 4 due to their avoidance of contemplating that they are tracking would-be desisters into trans identities, and that this could account for their drastically higher persistence rates versus prior studies.

The same group of researchers published a paper called Retransitioning: The experiences of youth who socially transition genders more than once that focused on the youth who keister from a cross-sex identity. Their use of the term “retransition” is the new preferred parlance of affirmative model advocates.

They state:

Conclusions: These findings largely do not support common concerns about retransitions. In supportive environments, gender diverse youth can retransition without experiencing rejection, distress, and regret.

This comment lends no proof one way or the other that the affirmative protocol is or isn’t significantly increasing the likelihood that youths will medicalize.

The study Progression of Gender Dysphoria in Children and Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study tracked youth from an insurance database:

METHODS
A cohort of 958 gender-diverse (GD) children and adolescents who did not have a gender dysphoria–related diagnosis (GDRD) or GAHT at index were identified. Rates of first GDRD and first GAHT prescription were compared across demographic groups.

And:

The STRONG cohort includes participants from Kaiser Permanente (KP) integrated health care systems in Georgia, Northern California, and Southern California.

They found that some youth with gender dysphoria diagnosis were not dysphoric post puberty. It also appears females may be less likely to desist than males:

Both Dutch studies found that most participants did not experience gender dysphoria beyond puberty. This result is consistent with our observation that less than one-third of children presenting with GD behaviors received a GDRD and only approximately one-quarter initiated hormone therapy during follow-up. The Dutch researchers also reported a greater likelihood of unalleviated gender dysphoria in children who presented at an older age and among AFAB participants, both results in agreement with our findings.

A study, Karrington (2022), published by a trans-identified individual in Transgender Health, is called “Defining Desistance: Exploring Desistance in Transgender and Gender Expansive Youth Through Systematic Literature Review.” It claims that desistance isn’t a relevant concept for study. Desistance in the paper is defined below:

Thirty definitions of desistance were found, with four overarching trends: desistance as the disappearance of gender dysphoria (GD) after puberty, a change in gender identity from TGE to cisgender, the disappearance of distress, and the disappearance of the desire for medical intervention.

The conclusion of the paper obviously advocates for the affirmative model trans activists are demanding. Not bothering with tracking social and medical influences on persistence/desistance serves their priorities:

Conclusions: This review demonstrates the dearth of high-quality hypothesis-driven research that currently exists and suggests that desistance should no longer be used in clinical work or research. This transition can help future research move away from attempting to predict gender outcomes and instead focus on helping reduce distress from GD in TGE children.

Another trans activist produced a similar paper, Ashley (2022), called “The Clinical Irrelevance of “Desistance” Research for Transgender and Gender Creative Youth.”

Lisa Selin Davis, who has been writing on this subject, discussed desistance research in an article for Skeptic called “Trans Matters: An Overview of the Debate, Research, and Policies.”

She also reported on an individual case of desistance in an article titled “A Desister’s Tale.” The article concludes:

Children and their families should know about the desistance literature, and that the way they feel now, no matter how intensely, isn’t necessarily a sign of how they’ll feel in the future. By exposing them to a diversity of stories, including Ash’s, we can restore balance to the discussion in a way that may help many distressed young people navigate a difficult and confusing time.

Individual cases of desistance are also in “’Desistance’ in two cases of transgender men” on Why Evolution is True.

Despite the existence of desistance, WPATH is removing any recommendation for age restrictions on medicalizing minors.

Elkadi et al. (2023), a paper called “Developmental Pathway Choices of Young People Presenting to a Gender Service with Gender Distress: A Prospective Follow-Up Study,” discusses desistance rates:

This prospective case-cohort study examines the developmental pathway choices of 79 young people (13.25–23.75 years old; 33 biological males and 46 biological females) referred to a tertiary care hospital’s Department of Psychological Medicine (December 2013–November 2018, at ages 8.42–15.92 years) for diagnostic assessment for gender dysphoria (GD) and for potential gender-affirming medical interventions. All of the young people had attended a screening medical assessment (including puberty staging) by paediatricians. The Psychological Medicine assessment (individual and family) yielded a formal DSM-5 diagnosis of GD in 66 of the young people. Of the 13 not meeting DSM-5 criteria, two obtained a GD diagnosis at a later time. This yielded 68 young people (68/79; 86.1%) with formal diagnoses of GD who were potentially eligible for gender-affirming medical interventions and 11 young people (11/79; 13.9%) who were not. Follow-up took place between November 2022 and January 2023. Within the GD subgroup (n = 68) (with two lost to follow-up), six had desisted (desistance rate of 9.1%; 6/66), and 60 had persisted on a GD (transgender) pathway (persistence rate of 90.9%; 60/66). Within the cohort as a whole (with two lost to follow-up), the overall persistence rate was 77.9% (60/77), and overall desistance rate for gender-related distress was 22.1% (17/77). Ongoing mental health concerns were reported by 44/50 (88.0%), and educational/occupational outcomes varied widely. The study highlights the importance of careful screening, comprehensive biopsychosocial (including family) assessment, and holistic therapeutic support. Even in highly screened samples of children and adolescents seeking a GD diagnosis and gender-affirming medical care, outcome pathways follow a diverse range of possibilities.

This abstract confirms DSM diagnosed minors do desist from the clinical definitions of gender dysphoria as listed in the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition” which is supposed to have more rigid criteria, reducing the likelihood of defining desisters as “true trans.” The desistance rate is still low compared to prior studies where children were not affirmed in their gender dysphoria and cross-sex identification which is concerning. We can also see two of the minors who didn’t receive an initial DSM diagnoses, wound up with one later. The affirmation of gender dysphoria in youth with forming identities is a severe risk to these minors as transition regret appears to be increasing.

Topic 8 deals with detransition and regret. One can find many examples are LGB youth.

See Original Post 1) DO CHILDREN & TEENS WITH SERIOUS GENDER DYSPHORIA EVER DESIST FROM THE DYSPHORIA. YES

More blog posts relating to this Topic are here.

CONTINUE TO TOPIC 2:

Hormone blockers, trans youth, & permanent side effects such as sterility & loss of sexual function
Medical consequences of hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, surgery, to gender dysphoric & trans youth

Mermaids Blames J.K. Rowling for Trans Suicide Attempts

News Commentary

Mermaids, trans, children, J.K. Rowling

GHQ is concerned by the latest statement by Mermaids, an organization in the UK that promotes social and medical transition underage for gender dysphoria in which they suggest that debating the critical issues of appropriate healthcare for gender-dysphoric children and young adults leads to self-harm and suicide and therefore must be avoided. In the area of gender medicine, where little quality evidence exists regarding treatments and outcomes, and where the results of the treatments are life-long and irreversible, the debate is essential. Further, invoking youth self-harm attempts in a sensational and emotive way is at odds with the principals outlined by Good Samaritan, and other suicide prevention groups, which specifically caution against such practices due to the highly contagious nature of self-harm among young people. It violates the principles laid out in a fact sheet specifically addressing LGBT youth and suicide risk put out by the American Foundation for the Prevention of Suicide.

The fact that suicidality among transgender identifying individuals is elevated is yet another reason to promote, rather than suppress, vigorous debate. A recent report by the Sweden’s National Board of Health published in 2019 established that 0.6% of gender dysphoric individuals have committed suicide since 1998, which is 4.9-13.7 times higher than the general population. Suicides are complex, multifactorial events. The Swedish National Board found that people with gender dysphoria who commit suicide have a very high rate of co-occurring serious psychiatric diagnoses, which in themselves sharply increase risks of suicide. Further, they found that the general population with no gender dysphoria diagnosis but with other psychiatric diagnoses, had even higher suicide rates than the gender-dysphoric population. Another study (Wiepjes 2020) states that suicides happen at all stages of transition, including post medical transition.

Unfortunately, no studies to date have shown that affirmation of children or adolescents reduces suicide, prevents suicidal ideation, or improves long-term outcomes, as compared to either “watchful waiting” or psychotherapy (Biggs 2020). High post-transition suicide rates found in the adult populations further complicates the “transition or suicide” narrative. It is vital that debate regarding the treatments and outcomes in the area of transgender health is conducted in a fair, responsible, and intellectually rigorous way, to improve the quality of the available evidence and to provide gender-dysphoric individuals, their families, and their clinicians with accurate information on which they can base their decisions.

The media, LGBT organizations, and even some of the most prominent affirmative model mental health professionals and doctors (Diane Ehrensaft, Johanna Olson-Kennedy) promote a “transition or die” narrative to parents of trans-identified children to enforce affirmation in ways that Mermaids does. The information from Sweden’s National Board of Health and psychologist Dr. Zucker indicates suicide risk for gender dysphoric people is in line with other mental health issues such as depression and anxiety, a serious concern but not the “epidemic” some portray it as.

From GHQ Topic 15:

Dr. Zucker has noted that suicide ideation in trans youth should be a concern of parents and mental and medical health professionals involved in treatment of dysphoric youth. However, it is no different than the concern for the elevated suicide risk for all youth seeking mental health treatment.

We reference other problems with Mermaids regarding extremist behavior and promoting false narratives on the GHQ site:

https://www.genderhq.org/search?q=Mermaids

References:


American Foundation for the Prevention of Suicide. (2020). Talking About Suicide & LGBT Populations. Retrieved from https://www.datocms-assets.com/12810/1576937561-talking-about-suicide-and-lgbt-populations-2nd-edition.pdf

Bailey, M., Blanchard, R. (2017). Suicide or transition: The only options for gender dysphoric kids? 4thwavenow. Retrieved from https://4thwavenow.com/2017/09/08/suicide-or-transition-the-only-options-for-gender-dysphoric-kids/

Good Samaritans. Guidance for covering self-harm in the media. Retrieved from https://media.samaritans.org/documents/Guidance_for_covering_self-harm_in_the_media_FINAL_1.pdf

Mermaids. (August 28, 2020). A call to J.K. Rowling. Retrieved from https://mermaidsuk.org.uk/news/a-call-to-j-k-rowling/

Wiepjes, C.M., den Heijer M., Bremmer M.A., de Blok C.J.M, Coumou B.J.G., Steensam T.D. (2020). Trends in suicide death risk in transgender people: results from the Amsterdam Cohort of Gender Dysphoria study (1972–2017). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2020,1-6. doi.org/10.1111/acps.13164

Zucker, K. (2019). Gender Identity and Kids (starts at 1:03:32). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHREA4Q4V4Q.


Detransition and Gender Dysphoria


detrans_links_big.png

News Links

Detransition and regret rates appear to be increasing. Most regretters appear to be biological females and lesbians. Below are several links to articles about desistance and detransition.

1) This research paper acknowledges the complications in treating gender dysphoria in minors. Cases of desistance are reviewed.

“‘Taking the lid off the box’: The value of extended clinical assessment for adolescents presenting with gender identity difficulties:”

Abstract

As the number of young people referred to specialist gender identity clinics in the western world increases, there is a need to examine ways of making sense of the range and diversity of their developmental pathways and outcomes. This article presents a joint case review of the authors caseloads over an 18-month period, to identify and describe those young people who presented to the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) with gender dysphoria (GD) emerging in adolescence, and who, during the course of assessment, ceased wishing to pursue medical (hormonal) interventions and/or who arrived at a different understanding of their embodied distress. From the 12 case‘Taking the lid off the box’: The value of extended clinical assessment for adolescents presenting with gender identity difficultiesTaking the lid off the box’: The value of extended clinical assessment for adolescents presenting with gender identity difficultiess identified, 2 case vignettes are presented. Implications for the development of clinical practice, service delivery and research are considered.

2) Finland plans to study transition regret and detransition.

“Study aims to chart transition regret in Finland:”

"I wish I'd never done it"

Twenty-seven year-old Nita said her mental health problems were not adequately addressed before she began a medical female to male transition.

Nita said she's not alone and that she knows several people who have transitioned back to their original gender.

Irreversible effects

Nita began transitioning to male in her 20s, saying she approached transitioning lightly, akin to getting a tattoo. To make her body more masculine, Nita took testosterone and had a mastectomy.Study aims to chart transition regret in Finland

“The whole trans process injected meaning into my life. There was a constant goal to work towards,” she explained. “Now it bothers me that I’m a 27-year-old woman who sounds like a teenage boy.”

3) Carey Callahan has been an outspoken detransitioned women who is part of a group for individuals who have, or want to seek, medical transition services called Gender Care Consumer Advocacy Network. She addresses the libertarian transition environment under “informed consent.”

“Gender identity is hard but jumping to medical solutions is worse:”

The day I knew I should quit my job answering phones at the transgender health-care clinic in California was the day a caller (let’s use the name Betty) threatened her in-home caretaker with a knife during the call. As the caretaker begged our clinic’s nurse to track down Betty’s doctor and tell him that Betty was having a psychotic episode, Betty stood between her and the apartment’s front door with a kitchen knife. Betty had poorly controlled paranoid schizophrenia, and often called the clinic agitated, alternately whispering and screaming about government agents stalking her. Betty was also a trans woman whom most people regarded as male, the sex of her birth. 

The clinic followed the “informed-consent” protocol: its mission was to provide transgender patients who otherwise lacked access to health care with injections, skin patches and pills of feminising or masculinising hormones without having to pass through a series of requirements and assessments—known as “gatekeeping”—that restricted access in the past.

In medicine broadly, informed-consent refers to the ethical requirement that a clinician administering a treatment communicate to the patient the anticipated risks and benefits, as well as reasonable alternatives to the treatment. Yet for transition medicine in America, informed-consent programmes do not require clinical documentation, beyond patient reports, of the patient’s gender dysphoria over time (ie, a feeling of mismatch between one’s biological sex and gender identity) and readiness for medical interventions. 

Gatekeeping horror stories are notorious in the transgender community.

4) Lisa Marchiano is an LCSW who works with detransitioned people.

“The Ranks of Gender Detransitioners Are Growing. We Need to Understand Why:”

The young women with whom I have worked became trans identified during adolescence. They frequently did so in the context of significant family dysfunction or complex psycho-social issues. Sexual assault and sexual harassment were common precursors. A majority had an eating disorder at the time they became trans identified. Since detransitioning, most now understand themselves to be butch lesbians. In our work together, they traced complex histories of coming to terms with their homosexuality. Some faced vicious homophobic bullying before they announced their trans identification…

Dismissing detransition as a “panic” stirred up by biased media outlets does a grave disservice to the real men and women who are struggling through the difficult experience of detransition. It isn’t good science—or good journalism—to ignore a category of people simply because their pain is politically inconvenient.

5) The BBC has also recently covered the topic of detransition here and here.

6) Dr. Lisa Littman is doing a research study on desistance and detransition.

7) A video on “Detrantransition and Retransition” from National LGBT Health Information.

8) Several videos below cover individuals’ experiences with transition regret:

“A Woman's Place is marching on together (Leeds, 22nd November 2019) Thomasin Pick”

“Thoughts on butch erasure (FTM detransition)”

9) Storm Ryan, a well-known trans Youtuber, is very alarmed at the exploding numbers of trans-identified teens.

“my last trans vid ever”